Monday, August 6, 2018

2017-2018 A Year of Struggle


A YEAR OF STRUGGLE  mAY 2017 THROUGH MAY 2018


NYC May Day 2018


Worcester May Day 2018



Carpenters protest scab labor 2018

End mass gun murders 



Busses -yes, Cutbacks- No

Radical Pedegogy Conference



City Council 2017 Police Accountability


Anti foreclosure event at Worc. Court 2017

Tenants Rights Rally 2017

No Wars in Syrias or North Korea

Education Rally in Boston

EAW Cointract City Hall 2017

40 000 Stop Nazis in Boston

Immigrant Rally against Fascism Worcester







Saturday, June 16, 2018

COOKOUT FOR PROGRESSIVES






COOKOUT


Teachers for Change, Progressive Labor Party, Mass. Human Rights Committee, and many other activists and progressives


A multi-racial / anti-discrimination event. Discussion of our efforts for police transparency, fully funded schools, ending school to jail policies.


Sunday June 24, 2018, 12 Noon
Quinsigamond State Park, Lake Park Pavillion
Lake Ave. and Coburn Ave.

Worcester MA 01604


Pot Luck / Food will be available  all

Gordon 508 757 5873

Tuesday, June 12, 2018

Fair Housing Complaints





Overview of Fair Housing Law


State and federal law prohibit discrimination in the sale and rental of housing by property owners, landlords, property managers, mortgage lenders, and real estate agents. Learn more about your rights and responsibilities under fair housing law.

In Massachusetts, it is unlawful for a housing provider to discriminate against a current or prospective tenant based on: 
  • Race
  • Color
  • National Origin
  • Religion
  • Sex
  • Familial Status (i.e. children) 
  • Disability
  • Source of Income (e.g. a Section 8 voucher) 
  • Sexual Orientation
  • Gender Identity
  • Age
  • Marital Status
  • Veteran or Active Military Status
  • Genetic Information

Examples of Fair Housing Violations

Examples of unlawful practices include: 
  • Refusing to rent you, or charging you higher rent or other fees, based on one of these protected characteristics. 
  • Steering you away from particular properties or rental units based on one of these protected characteristics. 
  • Refusing to rent to you because you rely on public assistance (for example, a Section 8 voucher). 
  • Failing or refusing to make reasonable accommodations for tenants with disabilities, including exceptions to policies (for example, a "no pets" policy) or reasonable physical modifications (grab bars or wheelchair ramps, for example). 
  • Harassing you, whether based on gender or any protected characteristic listed above. More information about harassment in housing is listed here. 
  • Refusing to give you a mortgage, or charging you higher fees, based on any of the protected characteristics listed above. 
  • Threatening to report you to immigration authorities so that you or your family members will be afraid to exercise any of your rights under the law. 
  • Refusing to rent to a pregnant woman or a family with young children, or evicting families, because a property contains lead paint. For more information about lead paint and discrimination, click here. 
  • Retaliating against you if you report discrimination. 

File a Complaint

If you have been denied housing, charged a higher amount of rent or fees, subjected to harassment, or otherwise treated unfairly by a housing provider because of one of the characteristics listed above, you should file a complaint with the AGO’s Civil Rights Division or the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination.

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

Worcester Police Hiding in Plain Sight






Police Hiding in Plain Sight


On June 4, 2018 the Worcester Human Right Commission invited the Worcester Police Department to present their views to the public. The Chair of the Worcester Human Rights Commission said several time the Commission was a partner of the police. The forum certainly reinforced this perception.

The Worcester Human Rights Commission never said that it is a partner with the concerned residents of the City. Some people who asked questions were lectured about procedure. Other residents never spoke as the forum dragged on and  people left.
 I guess we should be happy that the police shared any information with us.

Some of the issues which the City police presented were:

1.     Hate Crimes – After many years of efforts by groups like the Massachusetts Human Rights Committee the police finally release hate crime statistics. The police do not include incidents that do not fit their profile in those statistics.

There were 10 hate crimes in Worcester in 2017. This number is so low it strained my and others’ credulities

2.     Body Cams – the Police Chief said that this was in “process”, but he could not name the next event in the process nor the date of the next event

3.     Diversity – The Police claimed to have a program geared toward student. However the police are compelled to hire veterans before all others in the State mandated affirmative action for veterans. Almost all successful police recruits are veterans.

4.     Horse Patrol – The police said that their horse patrols has a positive effect. Unfortunately the police could not give any evidence of the usefulness of horse patrols.

The cost of the four horses, truck, trailer, and minimum of 3 officers on a single assignment, stable, etc.  is over a half million dollars.  So far there has only been anecdotal stories of how kids liking horses. There has been no quantitative evaluation of the useful of horses by the police.

5.     The issue of complaints against police officers was presented in the best light for the police. There were few complaints last year. Most of the complaints made by civilians were not sustained. Most of the complaints made by Police commanders were sustained.  The police presented this as evidence that the police can police the police.

There might be a need for an independent auditor to evaluate all of the City’s Department including the police department.


Two concerned residents spoke of the trauma suffered by students as a result of interactions with the police.  For the elementary school children the trauma is the result of an older person adverse treatment by the police. She indicated that such trauma has been treated at Community Healthlink.

Another concerned resident point out the negative experiences of high school student with the police. She felt it was a factor in the so called School to Jail Pipelne that some characterized as racists.


I am not sure that any one in the City government is really listening or able to make effective policy.

Monday, January 1, 2018

The Politics of North High School Hurt the Students






The Politics of North High School Hurt the Students

Background

     North High School in Worcester has the largest high school populations in Worcester. Its students are mostly low income or English language learners or newly arrived. Some are all three.

     The City of Worcester is a Gateway City, a city into which many new comers arrive and live. It is well recognized that this has obligated   the City to provide increased services. Such as public education.

    It is also well recognized that low income students sometimes need increased services in order to maintain grade level. The same is also true for special education students.

    North High School like most urban schools has a majority of students with dark skin.

    The State government underfunds these students.
   
Try Our New Job Site
The Problem

     All parties say that the problem is the low standardized test scores of some of the students. This has been known for some time.  Given the demographics and the associated learning impediments, the low scores are not a surprise.

    Recently Superintendent Binienda initiated a “turnaround” program for North High School. When Principal Dyer went on medical leave, Superintendent Binienda moved her office into North High School and assumed some of the Principal’s responsibilities.

    The State Department of Education responded to the events by saying that it too was concerned.

The Fake Issues

     It is unlikely that the Department of Education (DEP) will take control of North High School. There DEP spokesperson stated as much.

    North High School does not have consistently falling standardized test scores. Its test scores for last year were higher than the year previous. This year scores might be lower than last year.

    It is already known how to improve the standardized test scores. The solution is to reduce class sizes and provide additional resources to newly arrived students, low income students, and special needs students.

    Superintendent Binienda moving her office into North High School has the feel of a publicity stunt or some other political move. I really do not see any real improvement coming from it.

The Real Issues



     A real issue is the use standardized tests to punish students, teachers and administrators. Students are denied their diplomas and teachers are fired based on test scores alone.

    Standardized tests certainly can be used to evaluate education and to make improvements.However, It makes little sense to use those tests as punishment.

     Even with the attached punishment standardized testing has not overcome the impediments of low income, English language learning, nor special needs. There is no need of further “turnaround” to tell us this.

    The real solution is to provide the needed resources to those students that are faced with external and internal learning impediments. This means fully funded public schools measured by the needs of the students and not the politicians.

Thoughts on Superintendent Binienda



     The Superintendent has done a good job overall. She was not my first choice for Superintendent, Ms. Binienda has an especially good way of dealing with the public. I met with her last summer and she was very knowledgeable and personable.

     I do not think that the School Committee should have given her such a high evaluation this cycle, when by her own admission two schools in mostly Black, Latino, low come locations are underperforming.

Telegram - Insider Rewards

Friday, December 22, 2017

The ADL, Chief Sargent, and Terrorism


The ADL, Chief Sargent, and Terrorism
   
     

The Anti Defamation League (ADL) has granted the City of Worcester money to send its police chief, Steven Sargent, to Israel purportedly to study “counterterrorism”. It also paid for officials from other New England communities to Israeli seminar as well.
I am against individualistic acts of terror and I have spent a large part of my adult life opposing the tactics of the Weather Unground and fascist groups.
The value of Chief Sargent’s trip is questionable in terms of preventing so called terrorist attacks in Worcester.  The situations and material conditions in Worcester are significantly dissimilar than those found in Israel.  Israel has militarily occupied Palestine and is blockading Gaza. The Palestinians live under military rule without some basic human and civil rights.
                                                                Chief Sargent

In Worcester there is a significant demographic change from a mostly White population to a mostly dark skin and immigrant population. Legally everyone in Worcester is protected by the U.S. Constitution. There are no known credible threats of mass killing or terrorism.
Reports from the Justice Department are that there is a greater threat of killings by Nazis and other White supremacists than by Al Qaeda or ISIS. Despite this fact the City of Worcester does not have a policy for making known to the public incidents of so called Hate crimes. The Chief, the City Manager, and the City Council have all ignored the demands of the public for such information.
It would be a reasonable request that the Chief and the City follow its own policy of “See something: say something” and seek the input of public hearings based on an annual report about Hate crime incidents.
Although I do not think it intentional, it seems to be the case that the Police Chief and the City has been played by the ADL. The ADL has been criticized for it blind support of the Israeli government. It has been criticized for its abandonment of civil rights issues in the United States.
 The ADL has been something of an ally in the fight against Nazism, especially when it concerns Jewish people. I welcome its help in the fight against Fascism in the United States. Nonetheless I expect some to play the race card and call me anti-Semitic.
Given the condemnation of the Trump administration anti-Palestinian policies, has the ADL cynically colluded with the President to involve the City of Worcester and others on the wrong side of an international dispute? The City of Worcester has a policy which it refuses to involve itself with anything that does not directly affect the City. For example it refused to allow a vote on the Iraq War even though residents of Worcester were killed and the City lost tax revenues.

                                                              Protesters at City council

This might be the time for the City to review its policy on Hate crimes and on accepting money from what some would say is agents of a foreign government. Public Hearing on Hate crimses is long overdue.

Saturday, December 16, 2017

Thomas, Clinton, and Me Too




Thomas, Clinton, and Me Too   

Thomas


In the early 1990s Justice Clarence Thomas was nominated to the Supreme Court of the United States. He had after his graduation from the College of the Holy Cross married a Black women from Worcester MA and they had a son. 

At the time of his nomination. Justice Thomas had divorced his wife and married a White woman. This was not unusual and some Black people would say that he had the “fever”. A term that meant that some Black men preferred White woman. Although many think it is a loving marriage, other thought it to be a sign of his rejection of the aspirations of Black people.

While at Holy Cross Thomas was very respectful of Black women. He had a theory that Black women became lesbians in reaction to being mistreated by Black men. Because of this I was surprised when Anita Hill complained that she was the victim of sexual harassment by Thomas. 

What convinced me she was telling the truth was her testimony that Thomas jokingly said “Isn’t that pubic hair on that coke can?”.  He had said the same to me and others while at Holy Cross.  Ms. Hill also testified that Mr. Thomas would talk of about large penises. Mr. Thomas at Holy Cross used to say that Black men from Georgia who ate ham had penises so long that they had to strap them to their legs.

It was something of an irony when Mr. Thomas played the race card in his defense against Ms. Hill.

Clinton


There is no doubt that Bill Clinton was a cheat, a womanizer, and a liar. Clinton’s victims, Flowers, Lewinsky, and other are looked down upon by many in society. I would like to hear arguments that President Clinton is not a narcissist, using the pretense of helping poor people to further his fame and fortune. His real legacy is mass incarceration of Black people and adversely reducing the safety net of the unemployed, the poor, and the homeless.

 I voted for him in 1992 and again in 1996. My vote was motivated by the concept that “It is the economy, stupid”. I have not voted for a Democratic presidential candidate subsequently.

Curiously Charles Barkley, a former professional basketball player for the Philadelphia 76ers, got it right. Shortly after Doug Jones won the senate seat in Alabama, Barkley said that the Democratic Party should no longer take Black working people and the poor for granted.

It is ironic that presidential candidate  Al Gore, about whom I have heard nothing bad, lost his presidential bid due in large part to the impeachment of President Clinton for his role in the Monica Lewinsky affair. Clinton like Nixon should have resigned and allowed Gore to be President before the 2000 election.

Also ironic is how Secretary Hilary Clinton came to be seen as an enabler of a asexual harasser, instead of a “good wife”. President Clinton’s actions negatively impacted many people he should have protected.

Such a resignation was never in the character of a narcissist womanizer.

Me Too



The “Me Too” movement has brought weight to the complaints by women of sexual harassment. Women had little credibility before the “Me Too” movement. Even when women were believed very few people cared, Just ask Paula Jones and Anita Hill. This trend of not caring, upsettingly was continued by many Trump supporters. President Trump has many accusers and a taped admission of his intentions to wrongfully sexually harass women.

Conclusion


The “Me Too “movement success will be measured by its success against Presidents, such as President Trump and President Clinton. Another measure of its success will be how seriously society takes the complaints of sexual harassment, especially the allegations made by dark skin women.