Talking
Criminal Nonsense
On Wednesday
July 29, 2015 there was a concerned citizens meeting regarding crime. The
meeting was held at the Jewish Community Center in Worcester MA West Side. The
West Side has traditionally been more White and affluent than the rest of
Worcester. This was reflected in the racial composition of the attendees.
The JCC is
about as far up Salisbury St. as a car can be driven without crossing into the
neighboring town of Holden. There is no
bus route to the JCC so that people from other neighborhoods in Worcester could
not easily attend. There are no sidewalks for many blocks.
The official
reason for the meeting was to reassure the residents of the West Side that the
armed home invasion on Flagg St. was targeted and not a general menace. While
reassuring the residents some of the City and County officials said things that
were nonsensical. Their comments were discouraging as they indicate that the
officials do not really understand what is going on in Worcester in regards to
criminality with the inference that they do not have a clue what to do.
The first
nonsensical statement made by the government officials was that most victims of
break-ins are gangster or drug dealers. This
statement has no foundation and; it is racist, albeit colorblind racism. It
implies that the victims of crime are themselves criminals.
The second
nonsensical statement is lumping together opiates use and marijuana use. Marijuana for personal use in Massachusetts is not a crime. There are no
statistics linking it in a significant way to break-ins.
Police Chief
Gemme rattled off some statistics about the number of break-ins in the City
over a couple of decades. He said that there were over 4000 break-ins in the 1990s,
and then it dropped significantly in the 2000s. More recently it has risen to
2200 per year average. The Chief did not say why there was a drop in break-in
or why there was a rise. There is nothing but anecdotal evidence that drugs or
gangs are significant factors. It is nonsensical to base a policy on the
ignorance of the causal connections of the problem.
A speaker
who I know to be a good person raised as a counter point that crime is caused
by poverty. I know this to be nonsensical. Most poor people are honest people;
we are more honest than the general population. Not all criminal are poor, but
it is the poor who the most likely victims of crime.
The bias of
the meeting could be seen when the so called facilitator would interrupt people
who tried to criticize abusive police interactions with residents or the ineffectiveness
of police policy.
There have
been over 23 shootings in Worcester this year. Most of the shooting have
occurred in less affluent neighborhoods. Unlike the quick reaction by the City
and County to the concerns of the West Side, there has been almost no public
response by the City to the problems of the less affluent neighborhoods. Last
night August 3, 2015 a mother and her toddler were shot.
This might
not be a surprise to some, as it seems that the City Manager, the Police Chief,
and the City Council do not know the underlying causes of the shootings and
therefore cannot articulate a credible policy.
Another issue is that there is little, if any,
transparency about police policy now in place. Many in the less affluent
neighborhoods have been treated in a disparately racist way by the City and the
police. When people have tried to have our grievances addressed, we have been ridiculed,
maliciously prosecuted, and retaliated against. After the Worcester Human
Rights Commission meeting of August 3, 2015 it seems that our complaints will
wind up in a file cabinet someway unread.
It is past time
the City had an honest with the residents of Worcester about police policy.
Every point a good one.
ReplyDelete