Dr. Cornell
West, Too Smart
Dr. Cornell
West spoke at Worcester State University on March 30, 2016. He is a difficult
man to understand, but most philosophers are. He certainly stepped on
everyone’s toes without any apparent concrete ax to grind.
At first Dr.
West talked about love and how it will change the world. By love he means agape
love or the love of human interactions and charity. He felt that this should be
our primary motivation. He reminded me of a gentleman in Worcester who also
says that his enemies will be swept away with this love.
Next Dr.
West talked of integrity of the individual and how we should not succumb to the
prostitution of ourselves for money and banality.
It was
almost sermonlike.
Then toes
started to get stepped on. He said many of the churches preached the gospel of prosperity
or pray to God and you will get rich or free of material want.
He attacked
President Obama, saying a Black President, a Black Attorney General, and a
Black head of Homeland Security, and the racist cops still are not being
punished.
Dr. West had
a good word for Malcolm X whom he saw as an model of the redemption of the
individual, a man who could change his life for the better in terms of social
interactions and leadership.
The Constitution of the United took a hit.
Dr. West pointed out that the Constitution made legal the exploitative nature
of the political bosses of the American Revolution, codifying slavery. His point as I understand it is those things
that are legal are not always just; we should not fall into the trap of
thinking legality equals Justice.
There was an
irony I suppose in his analysis of Donald Trump. Dr. West sarcastically called
Donald Trump “brother”. He said brother Trump was not yet a fascist. Dr. West thought Trump to be an egotist who
liked showing off how smart he is. The irony is that Dr. West seemed to be
doing the same thing.
Unfortunately
most of his audience was Worcester State University students who did not seem
to grasp the shock values of the Dr. West’s assertions. The terms he used like
“neo liberal” seemed to confuse many.
From my own
experience terms used by contemporary college students like “intersectionality”
go over my head as well.
Dr. West is
in his sixties and a generational gap may be developing with semantics of the
1960s and 2010s. I heard some of the students leaving say that they wanted to
cut through the crap and get to the message.
One of the
things Dr. West does not have is a cause to fight for. He did not say he wanted
to close down Guantanamo. He did not say he wanted $15 minimum wage. He did say
he was for a general redistribution of power.
When you do not have a cause, speech becomes more philosophical or
ethical. It is like someone showing off
how smart he is.
What I
learnt from Dr. Hampsch, one of my philosophy teachers at Holy Cross, is that
Karl Marx changed philosophy when he said our job is to make history, not just
to study it. That thought repeated itself as I listened to Dr. West.
Thanks, Gordon. A hard-hitting and clear analysis. I wasn't there, but sounds as if I didn't miss too much. You're right, he needs a cause! There are plenty out there.
ReplyDelete