Going Back to Electoral College
This year was the second year in 16 years that an USA Presidential Election had a candidate with the most popular votes who did not get the most Electoral College
votes. Now there are calls for the abolition of the Electoral College. Its
abolition is almost impossible and it will have to wait for a new generation of
voters. People working on its abolition are probably wasting their energies.
There is a Gordian Knot entanglement between states and the
Electoral
College. The Electoral College was created to protect small
states. There is no workable definition of a state, except that a state is what
the Congress defines it to be. As a result we have hodgepodge of political
entities such as Alaska and Rhode Island which are states. Other political
entities such as the District of Columbia are not.
At first the Electoral College
protected the states with small populations from being dominated by the states
with large populations. Of course this creates inequalities. For example the
smallest state in terms of population is Wyoming with about 550, 000 residents.
Wyoming has 3 votes (electors) in the Electoral College. Montana which also has
3 electors, but almost twice the number of residents.
This proportional inequality is
magnified when Wyoming is compared to larger states like California.
The supporters of the Electoral
College will sometimes argue that the Electoral College will prevent national voter
recounts. The recounts would be limited to individual states. An example of
this is the Florida recount of 2000.
Even then in 2000 the Electoral
College did not prevent a Constitutional crisis. The Supreme Court ruling has
not resolved that issue. For that reason Jill Stein of the Green Party is
seeking recounts in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.
As an old friend once told me the
real motivation for American politics is race and class. So it is with the Electoral College,
Originally the proposal was for the
President of the United States to be elected by the Congress. There was no
popular election. Many thought that men without means could not elect a
qualified president. Those who argued for a popular election by the people had
to settle for the election by the states via Electors who then elected the
President in a process described in Article II of the Constitution.
Unfairly women did not have the
Franchise until the1920s. No enslaved person could vote. This disfranchisement of
Black people continues in the form of not allowing ex-felons the Franchise and
by voter suppression.
All of the Anti Bellum slave states
supported the Electoral College as the enslaved people were not counted as
people in the Federal Census. Our ancestors were counted as chattel. This meant
that all of the slave states had very residents. The slaves owning plantation
class were relatively few in number.
Faced with the loss of political power all of
the slave states took their horrible irrationality and crimes a step further.
They argued that enslaved people were not people when in their respective
states, but should be counted as a person in the Federal Census.
Of course the free soil states
pushed back and said “no”. From that dispute arose the so compromise that
enslaved people would be counted as 3/5 of a person in the Federal Census.
The abolition of slavery by the 13th
Amendment put an end to that particular issue for the Electoral College.
Since the Civil War the Electoral
College has been a refuge for the smaller mostly rural states like Wyoming. The
United States like the rest of the world is moving to a point that 80 percent
of the world population will soon be living in cities.
The material conditions are changing
such that not only the Electoral College, but its small states protectors are
becoming obsolete and something of an anachronism.
A reasonable person could wonder
about the usefulness of the Electoral College and then wonder about the
usefulness of small states like Wyoming, Montana, Vermont, and even
Massachusetts.
No comments:
Post a Comment